Should women be allowed to have an abortion under certain circumstances? Should a woman be allowed to have an abortion when she got pregnant desirably? While abortion may be Immediately framed as murder according to the majority of society’s opinion, some still argue that it is abortion is the best option for women’s stable mentalities. This issue is a very controversial matter that many people have debated about. Along with the debates, many laws were also formed to govern the legality of this matter.
While only thirty countries from all over the world legalize abortions, the rest of countries have “partial restrictions or complete ban on abortion, unless life of the mother Is at stake” (Ladino 1). There are many reasons for a mother to choose abortion, but the cause of rape and health Is only seven percent of all the abortion cases. The primary cause of abortion is resulted from “personal and social” issues of the mother (Ladino 1). There are many pros and cons toward this controversial issue. The cons of abortion are mostly argued with pro-life matters. By all accounts, abortion appears like an awful crime.
After all, abortion implies denying someone a well-deserved life. Just because the odds are not In our favor, can we deprive someone the chance to live? By terminating a life, can we Justify our acts? A baby is often considered as a God’s gift, and it’s believed that every living being has a purpose behind his/her birth. By tampering with a life, aren’t we acting against the creator of the world? Having an abortion done always carries the risk of not being able to become pregnant ever again in life. Abortion can also lead to serious health complications, and in some cases the worst-case scenario can be death.
It often leads to unwanted memories, which can result Into great stress and depression. Some women experience a feeling of guilt, which lasts for their whole lifetime. In short, abortion can turn out to be a lifetime worth of burden. The pros are mostly argue with the rights of a woman. Sometimes life can be really harsh on us. There are times when abortion may appear as the only option for the betterment. Although a mother may have a hard time opting for this option, she may eventually consider this soul-killing decision, keeping in mind all the pros and cons of this decision.
At the end of the day, a mother has to go through the actual labor pain and other Issues Involved with parenting and gulling responsibilities. Others can’t precisely gauge or understand the level of trauma that a woman may be experiencing in her personal life. She is the only person who knows best, if she would be able to take care of the unplanned child or not. We all know that it’s merely impossible to raise a child without family support and finance In hand. To a great extent, the life of the baby depends upon the mother’s health. In some cases, medical emergencies compel a woman to resort to this action.
There Is a possibility that her own life might be at risk, If she delivers the child. Some of the rape victims can be minors. They wouldn’t be mentally or physically prepared to take care of the newborn baby. Why should such victims go through the ordeal of bearing a child, which is a product of some unfortunate incident of their life? Technologies have enabled disease detection amongst unborn babies. Giving life to an unhealthy baby and watching it suffer all day and night can forced to produce a life? Giving life to an unwanted child might invite world of troubles for both mother and the child.
So, are we being fair to the child? Why should abortion should be remained as illegal? Abortion is the intentional killing of a human fetus by chemical and/or surgical means. It should not be confused with miscarriage (which involves no human intention) or contraception (which uses various technologies to prohibit sperm and egg from producing a fertilized ovum after sexual intercourse). Miscarriages are natural (if sad) occurrences, which raise no deep moral issues regarding human conduct?unless the woman was careless in her pregnancy.
Contraception is officially opposed by Roman Catholics and some other Christians, but I take it to be in a moral category entirely separate from abortion (since it does not involve the killing of a fetus); therefore, it will not be addressed here. Rather than taking up the legal reasoning and history of abortion in America (especially concerning Roe vs.. Wade), this essay makes a simple, straightforward moral argument against abortion. Sadly, real arguments (reasoned defenses of a thesis or claim) are too rarely made on this issue.
Instead, propaganda is exchanged. Given that the Obama administration is the most pro-abortion administration in the history of the United States, some clear moral reasoning is called for at this time. The first premise of the argument is that human beings have unique and incomparable value in the world. Christians and Jews believe this is the case because we are made in God’s image and likeness. But anyone who holds that humans are special and worthy of unique moral consideration can grant this thesis (even if their worldview does not ultimately support it).
Of course, this will not move those like Peter Singer who do not grant humans any special status. We cannot help that. Many true and Justified beliefs (concerning human beings and other matters) are denied by otherwise intelligent people. Second, the burden of proof should always be on the one taking a human life and the benefit of doubt should always be given to the human life. This is not to say that human life should never be taken. In an often cruel and unfair world, sometimes life-taking is necessary, as many people will grant.
Cases include self-defense, the prosecution of a Just war, and capital punishment. Yet all unnecessary and intentional life taking is murder, a deeply evil and repugnant offense against human beings. (Those, such as absolute pacifists, who believe that it is never Justifiable to take a human life would also acknowledge this. Third, abortion nearly always takes a human life intentionally and gratuitously and is, therefore, morally unjustified, deeply evil, and repugnant?given what we have said about human beings. The fetus is, without question, a human being.
Biologically, an entity Joins its parents’ species at conception. Like produces like: apes procreate apes, rabbits procreate rabbits, and humans procreate humans. If the fetus is not human, what else could it possibly be? Could it be an ape or a rabbit? Some philosophers, such as Mary Anne Warren, have tried to drive a wedge between Persephone and humanity. That is, there may be persons who are not human (such as God, angels, Test?if they exist), and there may be humans that are not persons (fetus or those who lose certain functions after having possessed them).
While it is true that there may be persons who are not humans, it does not logically follow that there are humans who are not persons. The nonporous. When we separate Persephone from humanity, we make Persephone an achievement based on the possession of certain qualities. But what are these person-constituting qualities? Some say a basic level of consciousness; others assert ability outside the womb; still others say a sense of self-interest (which probably does not obtain until after birth). All of these criteria would take away humanity from those in comas or other physically compromised situations.
Humans can lose levels of consciousness through injuries, and even infants are not viable without intense and sustained human support. Moreover, who are we to say Just what qualities make for membership in the moral community of persons? The stakes are very high in this question. If we are wrong in our identification of what qualities are sufficient for resonator and we allow a person to be killed, we have allowed the wrongful killing of nothing less than a person. Therefore, I argue that Persephone should be viewed as a substance or essence that is given at conception.
The fetus is not a lifeless mechanism that only becomes what it is after several parts are put together?as is the case with a watch or an automobile. Rather, the fetus is a living human organism, whose future unfolds from within it according to internal principles. For example, the fertilized ovum contains a complete genetic code that is distinct from that of the other or father. But this is not a mere inert blueprint (which is separable from the building it describes); this is a living blueprint that becomes what its human nature demands.
Yet even if one is not sure when Persephone becomes a reality, one should err on the side of being conservative simply because so much is at stake. That is, if one aborts a fetus who is already a person, one commits a deep moral wrong by wrongfully killing an innocent human life. Just as we do not shoot target practice when we are told there may be children playing behind the targets, we should not abortion fetus if they may be persons with the right not to be killed. As I have argued, it cannot be disputed that abortion kills a living, human being.
Many argue that outside considerations experienced by the mother should overrule the moral value of the human embryo. If a woman does not want a pregnancy, she may abort. But these quality of life considerations always involve issues of lesser moral weight than that of the conservation and protection of a unique human life (which considers the sanctity or innate and intrinsic value of a human life). An unwanted pregnancy is official, but the answer is not to kill a human being in order to end that pregnancy. Moreover, a baby can be put up for adoption and bring Joy to others.
There are many others who do want the child and would give him or her great love and support. Furthermore, it is not uncommon for women to experience deep regrets after aborting their offspring. The only exemption to giving priority to the life of the fetus would be if there were a real threat to the life of the mother were the pregnancy to continue. In this case, the fetus functions as a kind of intruder that threatens the woman’s life. To abort the pregnancy would be tragic but allowable in this imperfect world. Some mothers will nonetheless choose to continue the pregnancy to their own risk, but this is not morally required.
It should be noted that these life-threatening situations are extremely rare. Why should abortion be legalized? Abortion has been one of the biggest controversies of all time. Many people believe it is immoral and even consider it to be murder. The definition of abortion is; “The termination of being capable of normal growth. ” 1 These pro-life believers do not support the idea of induced abortion and believe it should be illegal. Many of these supporters do not know that if abortion were illegal an uneducated staffs would still perform them, unfortunately. Over 70 thousand maternal deaths occur every year because of unsafe abortions .
These women die, so the idea of supporting pro-life is contradictory, this is why the nation should be pro-choice. Pro-choice believers support the right to privacy and the idea women should have the choice to do what she pleases with her own body. As an example; a woman is raped by a man and becomes pregnant with his child. She decides she doesn’t want to keep the baby; she has an abortion cause the idea of raising a child of her rapist is too painful for her to cope with. Pro-choice defenders take sympathies to this woman while pro-life supporters then call her a murderer.
Abortions sometimes result in the woman being harassed because of the choice she has made about her own body. That’s what pro-life supports. Often time’s situations like this turns into harassment, which can be considered to be part of anti-abortion violence . These pro-life supporters stalk, threaten, and even sometimes kill women who have chosen to have an abortion and even the doctors that provide the procedures. Pro-life also supports the idea that every child has a right to live, even if the mother is not financially able to support the child and the child would struggle everyday along with its mother.
These children would be underprivileged and could potentially die from the circumstances they’ve be forced to live in. Again this is what people that are considered to be “pro-life” defend. Pro-choice supports the girl that is fifteen years old loses her virginity and becomes pregnant because she wasn’t fully aware of the consequences of her actions. The choice of her keeping the child would result in her getting kicked out of err home, she’d be financially unable to support the baby, and she would lose her education.
With abortion she would not have to deal with these issues, though she would have to deal with the emotional aspect of deciding to terminate the fetus. Pro- choice supports the idea she would learn from her mistake and that ultimately it was her choice to do what she wished with her body. The results of the experience for this girl would be social maturity and evolution, rather than a state of repression. Even though many people practice pro-life because of their religion, it may be reprising to learn that catholic women are 29% more likely to get an abortion than Protestant women, though they are as likely as all women to do sis.
In Christianity abortion has been considered homicide since Pope Sixths V declared it so, but the debate didn’t become heated until the 19th century. So even these pro-life supporters sometimes find the circumstances where abortion is necessary. An example of a situation where you may see this is in a given situation where bearing a child and giving birth would kill the mother because of health issues or womb implications the fetus would have. It’s said that the risks of death associated with childbirth is 10 times higher than that of abortions.
This proves that life is too situational to say whether or not abortion should be illegal. About 14,000 women get abortions fallowing incest or rape and it is estimated that 43% of women worldwide will have an abortion by the time they are 45 years old. It is also estimated that there are 43 million abortions a year. Imagine that those abortions had not occurred with planet and we have limited resources, which are depleting quickly. So in a strange ay abortion is beneficial to the planet. Pro-life supporters do not see the situations, reasons, and benefits from abortions.
They are ignorant to the reason why many women choose to make the decision they do. It is clear abortion should remain legal; even if it seems immoral it can often be the best situation for the people that have to make that tough decision. Pro-choice defends and protects the people, it is ultimately the woman’s life that would be affected and no one else’s, who would the government be to take that away from us the people? We live in a country based on freedoms, and omen have and should continue to have the freedom to that choice.
Whether you agree or not, abortion will always play an active role in our society. In the US itself, more than 4000 cases of abortion are reported on daily basis. While for one, abortion can be a highly miserable experience, to the other, having a forced child can be a highly miserable experience. It’s impossible to go by a rulebook, when it comes to dealing with an issue, where human lives are at stake.
