There are some stark differences in the social structure when comparing Mesopotamia and India in the early time of the world, but there were many similarities as well. Religion was very powerful in that time and helped guide the social structure. In Mesopotamia you had a central monarchy that introduced the code of Hammurabi, while India lacking any form of bureaucracy followed a stringent caste system that has evolved and a form of it still used today.
There were multiple attempts for conduct and law in Mesopotamia, but none took hold until Babylon. Babylon is where the code of the Hammurabi was introduced however they were known for much more than theyre of social laws like, Mathematics, astronomy and literature (aqrobatq, 2015). The Code of Hammurabi is better known to us today as “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth”. Which meant that there was fair punishment for a committed crime, if you were of the same class. There was…
The Caste system is a way to categorize people in society by their ethnicity and job status. This was also hereditary and would pass from generation to generation. The caste system, though it shares the classes that many ancient civilizations followed, did not necessarily influence them at all. Some theorize that if that were the case others would have a more defined class system rather than based on wealth and status, which most of them did. Rather some historians theorize these caste came from a war and fighting with the Dravidians, the dominate group in that area.(aqrobatiq, 2015) How ever the system formed it stuck, with almost impossible odds against someone to change their caste in life. The Caste system formed out of the natural self organization that humans do when lacking a bureaucratic system in place like Egypt and Mesopotamia, The levels of the Caste system from top to bottom…
