In the global world of today has been a critical topic that almost led to some catastrophe among different kinds of religious group in every society, a hot topic that can cause rioting between leaders and their followers. People hate to know the truth; they hate to follow the right path. Human are heartless, why is it that they love ignorance? People do commit murder crime in the society one way or the other but they fail to accept the truth.
Murder is not Just when one takes a knife and slay some one but It Is when one terminates the soul of a human. There shouldn’t be any other crime greater than that. Unborn babies Inside the womb are human like us, right when they are still a zygote that is when a diploid cell formed as a result of fusion of two haploid nuclei during sexual reproduction, that is the initial stage for every human. As a fact, we all went through the stage and if we were terminated (Aborted) we would have not been in existence today.
This is a fact because the definition of murder on the web site dictionary says”let is unlawful premeditated killing of a human being by a human being”. Some people out there do say that murder Is both a legal and a moral term that are not always coincident. It may be legal to kill, but still murder in the moral sense. Opponents of the death penalty argue that it is simply murder by the state. Opponents of abortion argue that it is legalized murder. No murder have to be legalize in our society, any one who committed abortion should have to be convicted of murder.
Webster dictionary defines abortion as the expulsion of a non-viable fetus during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, which Is another great name for murder. Majority of women in our society terminate their baby because it is unwanted, yet she is not charged and never accepts that she has killed someone. Is this right? Believe it or not, this has happened more than sixty-million times in the past ten years. The problem is that they have been killed legally because of abortion.
Many people approve of abortion because they consider that a fetus Is not an Individual human until birth; Can’t we Just follow these simple examples how web sites define rectum that “A developing human from usually two months after conception to birth”. For example, couple of years ago when I was in my final years in high school, I use to have a girl called Jenny. Jenny cheated on me by flirting all around with some other guys like dog in campus, because of that I dumped her like a freeing rag.
She finally got pregnant and do not recognize the father of the baby while she went to a doctor for abortion. I saw her after some weeks and asked her of the baby but she said “l did terminate It by a doctor”, I was , ” Jenny you already committed murder and you have to be put to justice” but she refused to accept that she has commit murder, she aid it is what her friends do at least twice a year and after all it is Just a effect not human. On the other hand, people like that will tell you that life begins at some arbitrarily defined point... Earth, the third trimester, when the baby can survive outside of the womb, something along those lines. Up until that point, they will tell but a human life. Therefore, they’ll tell you that it doesn’t matter if you abort the fetus because no human life is being lost. This is bad in a society; I can even prove that the doctor who carried out the abortion should be convicted of murder. They Hough they are doing their own Job and it is legal, but I have made many research that they too are murderers of the century.
I knew that both the doctor and the patient will never accept that they are murderers but many research has proven that they are the murderers of the century. Abortion is wrong and it shouldn’t be legal. If a doctor killed a baby one minute after it were born, they would be charged with murder. But if they were to kill a baby one minute before it were born, and a minute before that and so on, they would not be considered a murderer. At what minute can one consider life worthless and the next recipes?
Some people will say that abortion is not a matter of life and death, but medical research proves that the fetus is a living organism. People also argue that a woman has the right to control her body and has the right to an abortion, but the fetus is a completely different life. For example, if I told you that I believed that life began when the mother gave birth to the child, but that I still opposed abortion, you’d be left be scratching your head. Why wouldn’t I support getting rid of a mass of non-viable tissue? Would I feel the same way about let’s say a tumor or liposuction?
In other words, being anti-abortion without believing that life begins at conception would seem to be an intellectually inconsistent position. The controversy swirling about this question can be explained by the fact that different people use different standards of measurement by which to define “human life. ” Some would define it through a ethologic or religious faith belief. Some would define “human life” using certain philosophic theories and beliefs. Others define “human life” by using biologic, scientific facts. Let us briefly explore the three methods of measurement.