Home » Government » How the Government May Have Created AIDS

How the Government May Have Created AIDS

Good evening, I’m Michel Kassett.  This is Network 23.  A couple of
weeks ago we had a program on the subject of AIDS, addressing the question
of whether AIDS — the AIDS virus — was created by the government; and I’m
sure that some people were quite shocked by what they heard.  We spent that
entire program relating to you the evidence of a very substantial amount of
factual evidence which supports the proposition that AIDS is a synthetic
biological agent that was deliberately engineered by the US government as
an instrument of depopulation.  This is by far the most controversial and
dangerous subject that we have ever addressed on this program, so I would
like to review briefly the major points — the most significant pieces of
evidence — that I presented two weeks ago.

The first point was that in the early 1970’s, Henry Kissinger wrote a
top secret document — a National Security Memorandum (“NSM 200”) — in
which he indicated that “depopulation should be the highest priority of US
foreign policy towards the Third World.”  This Memorandum which can be
obtained from the US National Archives, which was only declassified very
quietly in 1990, was adopted by the National Security Council as official
US foreign policy towards the Third World.  Now, this is a classic example
of the “secret government” in action, because of none of this was known to
the Congress, and certainly, it was not known to the American people.  Did
any of you know that depopulation was considered a matter of US national
security?  Did any of you know that for the past 20 years, depopulation has
been the highest long-range priority of US foreign policy towards the Third
World?  No you didn’t, because it was classified — it was a secret.

I would like to read for you just a piece of this document.  It is
written by Henry Kissinger:

“Reduction of the rate of population in these States is a matter of
vital US national security.”  [National Security Memorandum, Henry

And we even have a map of those areas in which Kissinger indicates
where depopulation would be desireable.  It’s all Third World countries —
it’s all brown people and yellow people, of course.

“The US economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals
from abroad, especially from less-developed countries.  That fact gives the
US enhanced interests in the political, economic and social stability of
the supplying countries.  Wherever a lessening of population can increase
the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to
resources, supplies and to the economic interests of the United States.”
[National Security Memorandum, Henry Kissinger]

Now, when Kissinger says “economic interests of the United States…”
he means the interests of US corporations, which are in fact,
multi-national corporations, with no loyalty to this country whatsoever.
NSM 200, unlike other government documents on the subject, outlined
“international and political and economic implications of population
growth…” rather than its ecological or sociological aspects.  Like we
have been saying all along, the New World Order is a business, and the US
Government is in the business of business.

Now, the next document was from the US Senate Library.  It is a record
of the Appropriations Hearing that was held in July of 1969, where the
Department of the Army specifically requested and received $10 million to
develop “a synthetic biological agent that would impair or destroy the
human immune system.”  This is from the US Senate Library.  We also made
reference to several published articles from the World Health Organization,
written about the same time, which advocated similar kinds of research
toward the development of “a hybrid virus that could selectively effect the
human immune system.”

Like it not, these documents all exist.  The Kissinger Memorandum, the
Army Appropriations Hearing, the articles from the World Health
Organization; these are official records — facts of history — that can
not be disputed.

We also pointed out an incredible coincidence.  The World Health
Organization went into Central Africa in 1972 — into an area that is known
as the “AIDS Belt” — and administered a smallpox vaccination to several
thousands of Africans.  This event was followed immediately by the first
outbreak of AIDS on this planet — a remarkable coincidence — that was
noted as a Front Page Headline in the London Times, but has never even been
mentioned in the US Media — never even mentioned.

Another startling fact that was never mentioned in the mainstream media
— the Hepatitis B Vaccine that was given to several thousand male
homosexuals in New York and San Francisco in 1978.  The fact is, every
single person who received that vaccine contracted AIDS — every single one
of them — without exception. That is what the first American victims of
AIDS all had in common.  They were receivers of the Hepatitis B Vaccine.
It is a document fact.  AIDS began in America in 1978 in the homosexual
communities of New York and San Francisco, immediately following a
government-sponsored program of Hepatitis B Vaccinations.  This is all
completely documented — it is completely true.

In our first program, we made many references to material that you can
and should read, such as the Strecker Memorandum, by Dr. Robert Strecker.
Another work called “Who Murdered Africa,” by Dr. William Douglas.  And an
incredible book called “A Higher Form of Killing,” which documents over 500
specific cases of biological experimentation by our government on an
unsuspecting public.  If you don’t think they do “that kind of thing,” you
are simply uninformed.

We also read you an official government report from the Royal Society
of Medicine in Great Britain, in which they state unequivocally that
“saliva and blood are vastly more infectious than genital secretions,” and
“that AIDS meets none of the criterion of a venereal disease.  That despite
the misrepresentations of the American Medical Establishment and the
American Government, AIDS is not primarily a sexually transmitted disease.”
All of that, according to the Royal Society of Medicine in Great Britain.
That’s a document that we have and we’ll come back to it in just a moment.

We also shared with you information and opinions from many
highly-respected physicians, like Dr. Robert Strecker, Dr. William Douglas,
Dr. Cantwell, Dr. Hazeltine, Dr. Alonso, who all agree that the AIDS virus
could never have occurred spontaneously in Nature.  That animal viruses
cannot jump species, as we are being told they did, as we are being asked
to believe happened — when allegedly, a green monkey bit an Africa and
precipitated the pandemic of AIDS. We know as a scientific fact that
viruses cannot jump species, unless they are specifically engineered to do
so.  And we also know for a scientific fact that the AIDS virus bears no
resemblance whatsoever to any virus ever found in a green monkey, but does
bear a total resemblance to cow virus and sheep virus, which have somehow
been bonded together.  The only possible way these two different species of
virus could bond together would be in a laboratory — something engineered
in a laboratory — and then further engineered to make the jump into a
human system.

We talked about the Laws of Virology, which state that for every case
of infection — viral infection — that is known and reported, there are 99
cases that are unknown and unreported.  This means that if we have 200,000
known cases of AIDS, then there are 20 million right behind it.  20 million
Americans who are HIV positive and do not know it.  We also shared quotes
from several doctors who believe that the HIV infection rate has now
reached approximately 100 million people on the Continent of Africa; 30 to
50 million in Asia; and no less than 20 million in the United States.

Again, the Laws of Virology state that the rate of infection for a
retrovirus, like the AIDS virus, the rate of infection will double
approximately every 12 months.  Another frightening fact that no one has
bothered to tell us, is that there are six different basic types of the
AIDS virus, and that each of these basic types, being what is called a
“recombinant retrovirus,” has a recombinant potential of 9,000 to the
Fourth Power.  “Recombinant” means the ability to change and recombine into
something new, and the calculation 9,000 to the Fourth Power times 6 is
literally in the hundreds of millions of trillions of different possible
forms and manifestations of the AIDS virus. [Note, the number calculated is
354,294,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 variations of the AIDS virus].  Now
that means that you would need a vaccine for every possible choice that the
virus could make, which is technically impossible; truthfully,
realistically impossible.  It’s like the influenza virus — there’s no
vaccine.  There are simply too many strains of it, too many different
varieties, to ever develop a single, comprehensive vaccine.

The bottom line?  We are not being told the truth about this plague.
In the words of Dr. Hazeltine in his testimony to Congress:  “AIDS is a
species threatening disease.”  Now, I don’t want to appear to bleak or too
hopeless. All of these doctors believe that some type of cure is possible,
but that we’re going to need a lot more money, and we’re going to have to
move beyond the strangle hold of the Medical Establishment — the AMA.  And
since he lives here in Los Angeles, I’m now going to put the number of Dr.
Robert Strecker up on the screen — I’m going to flash that number for you
now.  Please put that up, thank you.  [213 344-8039].  I urge you to write
down this number and to make this call.  Please call Dr. Strecker.  All you
have to do is call, and he will send you information — important critical
information — on the subject of AIDS.

Alright.  About 3 weeks ago we played an excerpt from a speech by Craig
Hulet, and tonight I want to play you something else from that speech which
relates to the subject of AIDS.  For those who do not know him, Craig Hulet
was a former advisor to the National Security Council and a former
consultant to several multi-national corporations, and he has, as they say;
“come in from the cold…” — he has crossed over and has spent the last 3
or 4 years writing and lecturing on the subject of the New World Order –
sharing with everyone who will listen, the breadth and the scope of his
knowledge and experience.

Mr. Hulet knows first-hand the kind of men who are running the world.
He knows what they’re up to and he is trying to warn us.  Now, on this list
of alternative sources of information, which so many people are writing in
to receive — you know all you have to do is send in a stamped,
self-addressed envelope, and we’ll send you one — the name at the top of
this list is Craig Hulet.  He is an indispensable connection.  So, right
now I want to play for you a small excerpt from a speech that he gave on
July 25th at the Hilton Hotel in Los Angeles.  His subject was George Bush
and the New World Order, but at the end of the evening, he was asked a
specific question about AIDS, and this is how he responded:

“… biological warfare virus by the US Military.  Sure…  I really
hate that subject.  You know, we’re never, ever going to be able to prove
— Strecker, William Douglas — we’ll never be able to prove that AIDS was
developed specifically to reduce the populations of Central Africa, the
black inner cities, drug users, prostitutes and homosexuals.  But it just
seems strange to me that all through the 1960’s and 1970’s, there were
books published; [the] Global 2000 Report to the President, [the] the Club
of Rome wrote a book on over-population — I must have 50 books on
over-population and the need to get rid of a certain large amount of people
on the planet.  Now, they never say which people out to be gotten rid of,
but it seems a major coincidence that the same people that are starving in
Ethiopia, in the Sudan, are the same people that getting AIDS and dying.
By the year 2000, they expect 60 million blacks in Central Africa to die of
AIDS.  60 million!  It could be as many as 20 million in America.
Homosexuals, predominantly, and the interesting thing is, it is not a
homosexual disease.  It IS a man-made, mutated disease.  It had to have
been man-made.  Sheep do not get together and do chemical experiments on
their viruses.  So, a man had to graft this bovine virus, which they know
that’s what it is, onto a human cell.  It had to be made.  So we know its
man-made.  They know it’s transmitted with the… because they know the
most effective device… the best test to discover if you have AIDS… is
not a blood test, it’s a saliva test.  Now why haven’t they told us that?”

“It’s not a sexually transmitted disease, it’s simply a disease that
gets transmitted.  And you can transmit it by sneezing on someone.  Why
don’t they tell us that?  In the Congressional Record, it says that it can
be transmitted “effectively” by mosquitos.  It says so.  The Center for
Disease Control, in the Congressional Record, says that it is transmitted
by mosquitos in Belgrade, Florida — they know it for a fact.  Why haven’t
they told us that AIDS is being transmitted by mosquitos?  They say it to
themselves in the Congressional Record, why don’t they tell us?”

“OK.  Here’s my theory.  Whether or not [AIDS] was created for the
purpose of exterminating the very same, coincidentally, same anti-social
element that the men I did business with for 15 or 20 years, though ought
to be gotten rid of anyways; homosexuals, prostitutes, blacks, etc., and of
course, the Black Continent — they want the resources but they certainly
don’t want to feed the people, see?  Why is that they are allowing all of
these myths to be told — the destruction to take place, and they’re doing
nothing to stop it?  Here’s my theory, and this is all it is — is a theory
— that they’ll find a cure when about 1 billion people on this planet have
died from AIDS, starvation and disease — all over the world, all of sudden
Eli Lilly, who is one of the major corporations doing AIDS research — and
coincidentally, George Bush on the Board of Eli Lilly — when they finally
eliminate huge sections of the population, which is what they always wanted
throughout the 1960’s and 1970’s, because of over-population — it’s called
“mitigating the problem.”  They feel that AIDS and famine and disease will
mitigate the problem of over-population. I suspect that around the year
2010 or so, all of a sudden Eli Lilly will announce that they’ve found a
phenomenal cure for AIDS, but not until a lot people die.  Because like I
said, it seems a major coincidence to me that the very same people that the
men I did business with for years, dislike the most, those people who just
happen to be the ones that are contracting AIDS — happens to be some of
the ones that are dying in famines, pestilence and bombing into the Stone
Age like we just did — I don’t believe in the “Coincidence Theory of
History” — I just don’t.  I haven’t for a long time because the CIA, the
National Security Council is too brilliantly planned. They plan everything
to the most minute detail.  I can’t believe that all of this is a
coincidence.  That’s all I can say though.”

“I’m going to do a White Paper on that one of these days.  One of the
reasons I haven’t is that if you talk about AIDS, you never get invited on
the university campus — you follow me?  So I never address AIDS… for 4
years I’ve had material on AIDS that addresses this in some fundamental
way, and some of it was very good documentation, proving some of the things
that I just said, but I have never discussed it because of you discuss
AIDS, I guarantee you, you will never be a speaker on the university
campuses.”  [Craig Hulet]

Once again, I want to say that even though it may not be proved in any
“absolute” sense, because absolute proof is impossible in a relative
universe, and that’s one of the tricks of the cynic or the skeptic, is that
they demand absolute proof, knowing full well there is no such thing as
absolute proof, there is only evidence, and a certain point you make a
decision on the basis of the evidence — you make a decision which becomes
your belief — on the basis of the evidence.  So, on the basis of the
evidence, it is my belief, it is my conviction at a very deep level, that
AIDS was deliberately created and implemented by the United States
Government — more specifically by certain individuals, most notably Henry
Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft and George Herbert Walker Bush, who was the
Director of the CIA at that time, when the Kissinger Memorandum was adopted
by the National Security Council.  I can’t prove it absolutely, by I
personally believe that Bush was deeply involved — a major player —
particularly in the implementation of this epidemic.  There’s an article in
the LA Times yesterday that says “Bush Defends AIDS Budget” and “urges
behavioral changes.”  There was a protest demonstration in Kennebunkport,
Maine — the AIDS Coalition to Unleash Power marched through the tiny
downtown area of Kennebunkport.  Bush criticized the gay activists for
“hurting holiday business” in this picturesque New England resort, for
“hurting holiday business.”

Quote (this is Bush talking); “To the degree the message hits some
merchant in Kennebunkport, on the best weekend possible, and caused them to
close their doors, I got that part of it, and I didn’t like it.”  This is
one cold reptile.  He goes on to say; “You know why they were here.  I know
why they were here.  They were here because you all are here,” said the
President to the White House Press Corp.  “They were here because they can
get television coverage, and to some degree, print coverage, because the
President happened to be at home.”

You see, he is contemptuous, he is contemptuous of the people that have
this disease.  A spokesperson for the demonstrators said that most of
Bush’s AIDS policy has gone into research on AZT, a drug that they said, at
best, can only slow the progression of the disease.  It’s like junk food
for viruses.  As Hulet just said, they don’t want to stop it, it’s
“mitigating the problem,” it’s getting rid of the undesirables.  When asked
what he thought should be done about the AIDS crisis, Bush said; “I’m in
favor of behavioral change.”

Now what is the subtext?  What is he saying?  He’s speaking to his 80%
constituency, telling them what they want to hear, and he is saying
basically that AIDS is caused by immoral behavior, immoral sexual behavior
or immoral drug use.  He knows that’s a lie, but he is a liar, so what do
you expect. He’s the master of deception.  He was in on it, I have no doubt

We said we were going to return this document.  This is the House of
Common Social Services Committee, and this is a document prepared by the
Royal Society of Medicine.  You can not get more official than this in
Great Britain.  And this is what they say:

“The scale of the deceptions and misinformation perpetrated by
virologists, clinicians and editors of scientific and medical journals
about the infectivity of genital secretions, compared with that of blood
and saliva, has been astonishing.  In the presence of a new, lethal virus,
spreading amongst people, for which no vaccine or cure is in sight, every
person would assume that scientists have been working day and night to
verify how it is transmitted.  On the contrary, having assumed for a
variety of motives that AIDS is a sexually transmitted disease like
syphilis or gonorrhea, a negligible research effort has gone into the
critical matter of transmission. A few preliminary papers were published
and their findings have been repeatedly quoted as showing the opposite of
what they actually showed.  When this was pointed out in letters to the
editors of American medical and scientific journals, publication has been
refused.  No attempt has been made to check or double-check the findings in
other laboratories, or to rectify published errors.”

“As far as it goes, the tiny research effort into infectivity of bodily
fluids indicates that saliva is far more infectious than genital
secretions, but that blood is vastly more infectious than either.
Consequently, the idea that condoms can have any significant effect on the
spread of AIDS in a nation is utterly preposterous.”

This is the Royal Society of Medicine in Great Britain.  I’ll

“Governments all over the world are spending millions of pounds
[dollars], advising their citizens to prevent AIDS by using condoms on the
basis of MANIFESTLY FRAUDULENT misrepresentation of scientific evidence.”

You know, if they’re going to spend millions of your tax dollars on
televised warnings, don’t you think they ought to include cuts and wounds
and saliva and breathing it into the lungs, which apparently happens —
16,000 health care workers are infected by AIDS.  Ask them.  Ask the ones
who believe their superiors at the AMA about the costs of ignorance.  You
want the truth about AIDS?  Get outside the American Blackout.  Get outside
the boundaries of the so-called “freest nation on Earth.”

Back in the 1960’s you know, we used to feel sorry for the Russian
people, because we knew they weren’t getting the whole picture.  We
wondered what that must be like.  My god, it was hard to imagine.  Well,
now we know.  Now we know exactly what it’s like, to live in a society
where crucial information — information critical to our survival is being
controlled and suppressed by the government.

The bottom line?  Very serious bad guys are in control of your planet.
And the name at the top of the list is George Bush.  George Herbert Walker
Bush, Emperor of the Earth and Supreme Commander of the Dark Side of the

Well, we’re out of time.  Good night.  I hope to see you all again next
week. If I don’t, you will certainly know why.”


The following is a transcript of the DOD1970 appropriations report mentioned

George H. Mahon, Texas, Chairman

ROBERT L. F. SIKES, Florida     GLENARD P LIPSCOMB, California
GEORGE W. ANDREWS, Alabama      JOHN J. RHODES, Arizona
DANIEL J. FLOOD, Pennsylvania   GLENN R. DAVIS, Wisconsin
JOHN M. SLACK, West Virginia
FRANK E. EVANS, Colorado



PAGE 129


There are two things about the biological agent field I would like to
mention. One is the possibility of technological surprise. Molecular
biology is a field that is advancing very rapidly and eminent biologists
believe that within a period of 5 to 10 years it would be possible to
produce a synthetic biological agent, an agent that does not naturally
exist and for which no natural immunity could have been acquired.

Mr. Sikes.     Are we doing any work in that field?
Dr. MacArthur. We are not.
Mr. Sikes.     Why not? Lack of money or lack of interest?
Dr. MacArthur. Certainly not lack of interest.
Mr. Sikes.     Would you provide for our records information on what would
be required, what the advantages of such a program would be,
the time and the cost involved?
Dr. MacArthur. We will be very happy to.

(The information follows:)

The dramatic progress being made in the field of molecular biology led us
to investigate the relevance of this field of science to biological
warfare. A small group of experts considered this matter and provided the
following observations:

1. All biological agents up to the present time are representatives of
naturally occuring disease, and are thus known by scientists throughtout the
world. They are easily available to qualified scientists for research,
either for offensive or defensive purposes.

2. Within the next 5 to 10 years, it would be possible to make a new
infective microorganism which could differ in certain important aspects from
any known disease-causing organisms. Most important of these is that it
might be refractory to the immunological and therapeutic processes upon
which we depend to maintain our relative freedom from infectious disease.

3. A research program to explore the feasibility of this could be completed
in approximately 5 years at a total cost of $10 million.

4. It would be very difficult to establish such a program. Molecular biology
is a relatively new science. There are not many highly competent scientists
in the field, almost all are in univerity laboratories, and they are
generally adequately supported from sources other that DOD. However, it was
considered possible to initiate an adequate program through the National
Academy of Sciences – National Research Council (NAS-NRC).

The matter was discussed with the NAS-NRC, and tentative plans were made to
initiate the program. However, decreasing funds in CB, growing criticism of
the CB program, and our reluctance to involve the NAS-NRC in such a
controversial endeavor have led us to postpone it for the past 2 years.

It is a highly controversial issue and there are many who believe such
research should not be undertaken lest it lead to yet another method of
massive killing of large populations. On the other hand, without the sure
scientific knowledge that such a weapon is possible, and an understanding of
the ways it could be done, there is little that can be done to devise
defensive measures. Should an enemy develop it there is little doubt that
this is an important area of potential military technological inferiority
in which there is no adequate research program.


In 1970, they were given their ten million dollars.


The following is a listing of the references used by Dr. Strecker
in his video “The Strecker Memorandum”. It also contains the text
printed on the outside of the video box.


The Strecker Memorandum

With no cure and no effective treatment in sight, by the year 2000
A.D. everyone in the U.S. will be infected with AIDS. This videotape
presents the chilling conclusion of 5 years of exhaustive research by
Dr. Robert B. Strecker M.D., Ph.D.

This is the most controversial videotape you’ll ever see. Dr. Robert
Strecker refutes, with documented evidence, virtually everything the
so-called experts and Government reports have told you about AIDS. He
asserts in no uncertain terms that:

AIDS is a MANMADE disease…
AIDS is NOT a homosexual disease…
AIDS is NOT a vernereal disease…
AIDS is can be carried by mosquitos
Condoms will NOT prevent AIDS…
There can never be a vaccine.

Although decades have passed and untold billions have been spent in
research, CANCER is still with us, the second major cause of death in

The most dreaded fear that all oncologists (cancer doctors),
virologists and immunologists live with is that some day CANCER in
one form or another will become a contagious disease, transferable
from one person to another.

AIDS has now made that fear a reality and if you think you’re safe
because you’re not gay or promiscuous, or because you’re not sexually
active, then you had better watch this videotape very carefully and
then watch it again and again if necessary, until you fully
understand what Dr. Strecker is telling you as he takes you step by
step and shows you how this dreaded disease was actually:


And now threatens the very existence of mankind because


Dr. Robert B. Strecker is a practicing Internist and
Gastroenterologist. In addition, he holds a Ph.D. in Pharmacology and
is a trained Pathologist.

1501 Colorado Blvd.
Eagle Rock, CA 90041



Greenberg DS  Whatever Happened to the War on Cancer?  Discover 1986;

Leibowitch, J.  A Strange Virus of Unknown Origin. trans. Howard R.
(Un Virus Estrange Venu D’Ailleurs. Grasset et Fasquelle 1984)  New
York: Ballentine Books 1985.

Connor, S.  AIDS: Mystery of the Missing Data; AIDS: Science Stands
On Trial  New Scientist 116: 19, 49-58,1987.


Letter by committee on Recombinant DNA, National Research Council,
National Academy of Sciences.  Potential Biohazards of Recombinant
DNA Molecules  Science 26 July 1974

Anonymous  Un-Natural Viruses  Nature New Biology 230:65-66, 1971.

Clemmesen J.  Summation  Comparative Leukemia Research 1973,
Leukemogenesis, Bibl. Haematologica  No. 40, Ed. Y. Ito and R M
Dutcher; University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo/Karger, Basel, pp 783-792,

Burnet F.M.  Men Or Molecules?  A Tilt at Molecular Biology  Lancet
1:37-39, 1966.


Shah K. AND Nathanson N.   Human Exposure To SV40: Review and Comment
American J Epidemiology 103:1-12,1976.


Allison A C  Beveridge WIB.  Cockburn E C. et al. Virus-Associated
Immunopathology: Animal Models and Implications for Human Disease
Bulletin  WHO 47:257-263, 1972.

Amos D B  Bodmer W F.  Ceppelini R. et al. Biological Significance of
Histocompatibility Antigens.  Fogerty International Center
Proceedings No. 15.  Fed Proc 31:1087-1104, 1972.

Higginson J  The Epidemiological Program of the International Agency
for Research on Cancer.  In: Seventh National Cancer Conference
Proceedings. Los Angeles: American Cancer Society, Inc. and National
Cancer Institute. pp.679-684, 1972. (Note the map on page 681 as it
relates to the epidiology of AIDS)


Dent P B  Immunodepression by Oncogenic Viruses  Progr. Med. Virol.

Aaronson S A  Common Genetic Alterations of RNA Tumor Viruses Grown
in Human Cells  Nature 230:445-447, 1972.  (An explanation of how to
adapt a retrovirus growing in one species to another – in this case

Maruyama K and Dmochowski L  Cross-species Transmission of Mammalian
RNA Tumor Viruses  Texas Medicine 69:65-75,1973. (A Study of how to
adapt a retrovirus growing in one species to another in vivo)

Maruyama K  Wagner S H and Dmochowski L  Sarcomas Induced in Rats by
Feline RNA Virus  Bibl. Haemat. 40:93-95, 1975.

Bonnard G D  Manders E K  Campbell D A  et al.  Immunosuppressive
Activiety of a Subline of the Mouse EL-4 Lymphoma  Evidence for
Minute Virus of Mice (MVM)  Causing the Inhibition  J. Exp. Med.
143:187-205, 1976.  (This paper along with the Iorio paper on the
production of a viral immunodepressive factor producing AIDS proves
the relationship between Bull. WHO 47:257,1972 and the subsequent
appearance of immunodepressive viruses.)


Clapham P  Nagy K and Weiss R A  Pseudotypes of Human T-cell Leukemia
Virus Types 1 and 2:Neutralization by Patient’s Srea  Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. 81:2886-2889,1984.

Shaw G M  Gonda M A  Flickinger G E et. al.  Genomes of
Evolutionarily Divergent Members of the Human T-cell Leukemia
(Lymphotropic) Viruses  Cancer Research 45(Supplement): 4553s-4558,

Rice N R  Stephens R M  Burny A et al. The gag and pol Genes of
Bovine Leukemia Virus:  Nucleotide Sequence and Analysis  Virology
142:357-377,1985. (Shows that BLV is highly related to HTLV I)

Burny A  Bruck G  Cleuter Y et al. Bovine Leukemia Virus, a
Distinguished Member of the Human T-Lymphotropic Virus Family
Retrtoviruses in Human Lymphoma Leukemia M. Miwa et al. Eds. Japan
Sic. Soc. Press.  Tokyo, VNU Science Press, Utrecht, pp. 219-227,.
1983. (Demonstrates the close structural and functional relationships
between BLV and Human Retroviruses)

Alizon M and Montagnier L  Relationship or AIDS to other Retroviruses
Nature 313-743,1985

Chiu I M  Yaniv A  Dahlberg J E  et al.  Nucleotide Sequence Evidence
for Relationship of AIDS retrovirus to Lentiviruses  Nature
317:366-3368,1985. (Demonstrates a relationship to BLV and Visna
viruses, among others)

Sanchez-Pescador R  Power M D  Barr P J et al.  Nucleotide Sequence
and Expression of an AIDS-Associated Retrovirus (ARV-2)  Science
227:484-492, 1985.

Ratner L  Haseltime W  Patarca R et al. Complete Nucleotide Sequence
of the AIDS Virus, HTLV III  Nature 313:277-284,1985.  (The authors
including RC Gallo demonstrate the relationship of AIDS to BLV)

Van Der Maaten M J and Miller J M Serological Evidence of
Transmission of Bovine Leukemia Virus to Chimpanzees  Veterinary
Microbiology 1:351-357,1976.


Alizon M and Montagnier L  Lymphadenopathy/AIDS Virus: Genetic
Organization and Relationship to Animal Lentiviruses  Anticancer
Research 6:403-412,1986.

Sonigo P  Alizon M  Staskus K et al.  Nucleotide Sequence of the
Visna Virus: Relationship to the AIDS Virus  Cell 42:369-382,1985.

Gonda M A  Wong-Staal F  Gallo R C  et al.  Antibodies to Cell
Membrane Antigens Associated With Human T-Cell Leukemia Virus in
Patients with AIDS  Science 220:859-862,1983.


Gonda M A  Molecular Genetics and Structure of the Human
Immunodeficiency Virus  J Electron Micro 8:17-40,1988.

Gonda M A  Braun M J  Carter S G et al.  Characterization and
Molecular Cloning of a Bovine Lentivirus Related to Human
Immundodeficiency Virus  Nature 330:388-391,1987.  (Relationship of
AIDS to BVV – its “closest relative”)

Grote J  Bovine Visna Virus an the Origin of HIV  British Journal of
the Royal Society of Medicine 81:620,1988

Strecker R B  AIDS Virus Infection  British Journal of the Royal
Society of Medicine 79:559-560,1986. (First article in print to
address how the AIDS virus was manufactured)

Seale J  Origins of the AIDS Viruses, HIV-I and HIV-2:Fact or
Fiction? Discussion Paper  British Journal of the Royal Society of
Medicine 81:617-619,1988.

Mima C A  Vertical Transmission of Viruses  Microbiological Reviews
45:267-286,1981. (States that an “alleged bovine visna virus” is
contaminating fetal calf serum – thereby implicating all tissue
cultures of the world as possible source for AIDS)

Boothe A D and Van Der Maaten M J  Ultrastructural Studies of a
Visna-Like Syncytia-producing Virus from Cattle with Lymphocyosis
Journal Virology 13:197-204,1974. (Demostrates the morphology of BVV
as being indentical to AIDS)

Georgiades J A  Billiau A  and Vanderschuren  Infection of Human Cell
Cultures with Bovine Visna Virus  J. Gen. Virology 38:375-381, 1978.
(Demostrates the growth of BVV in human malignant tissue, and
suggests that BVV may be a cause of either a malignant or slow virus
disease in man)

McClure H M  Keeling M E  Custer R P et al.  Erythroleukemia in Two
Infant Chimps fed milk from cows Naturally Infected with the Bovine
C-Type Virus Cancer Research 34:2745-2757,1974. (Demonstrates the
development of AIDS in two chimps fed cow virus orally in 1974.  The
Chimps Died of Pnemocystis carinii pneumonia. Pnemocystis carinii
pneumonia had not been reported in chimpanzees up to this time)

Note: See article above by Van Der Maaten and Miller on the
transmission of bovine leukemia virus to chimpanzees in 1976

Mulder C  Human AIDS Virus Not From Monkeys  Nature 333:396,1988.

Penny D  Origin of the AIDS virus. Nature 333:494-495,1988.

Parks, W P  Gilden R V  Bykovsky A F et al.  Mason-Pfizer Virus
Characterization:A Similar Virus in a Human Amniotic Cell Line J
Virology 12:1540-1547,1973.

Grantham R and Perrin P  AIDS Virus and HTLV I Differ in Codon
Choices   Nature 319:727-728,1986.

Wain-Hobson S  Sonigo P  Danos O  et. al.  Nucleotide Sequence of the
AIDS Virus, LAV  Cell 40:9-17,1985.


Rapp U R  Goldsborough M D  Mark C E et al.  Structure and Biological
Activity of v-raf, a Unique Oncogene Transduced by a Retrovirus Proc.
Nat. Acad. Sci.  80:4218-4222,1983.

Rapp U R  and Todaro G J  Generation of Oncodenic Mouse Type C
Viruses: In Vitro Selection of Carcinoma-inducing Variants  Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 77:624-628,1980.

Rapp U R  and Todaro G J  Generation of Oncodenic Type C Viruses:
Rapidly Leukemogenic Viruses Derived from C3H Cells in vivo and in
vitro  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 75:2468-2472,1978.

Rapp U R  and Todaro G J  Generation of New Mouse Sarcoma Viruses in
Cell Culture  Science 201:821-824,1978.

Tsichlis P N  Conklin K F and Coffin J M  Mutant and Recombinant
Avian Retroviruses with Extended Host Range  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

Rasheed S  Gardner M B and Huebner R J  In Vitro Isolation of Stable
Rat Sarcoma Viruses  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 75:2972-2976,1978.


Coffin J M  Structure, Replication, and Recombination of Retrovirus
Genomes: Some Unifying Hypotheses  Review Article  J. Gen. Virology

Hunter E  The Mechanism for Genetic Recombination in the Avian
Retroviruses  Current Topics in Micro. and Immun. 79:295-309,1978.

Blair D G  Genetic Recombination Between Avian Leukosis and Sarcoma
Viruses.  Experimental Variables and the Frequencies of Recombination
Virology 77:534-544,1977.

Wang L H  Duesberg P H  Mellon P et al. Distribution of
Envelope-specific and Sarcoma-specific Nucleotide Sequences from
Different Parents in the RNAs of Avian Tumor Virus Recombinants
Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 73:1073-1077,1976.

Duesberg P  Vogt P K  Beemon K et al.  Avian RNA Tumor Viruses:
Mechanism of Recombination and Complexity of the Genome  Cold Spring
Harbor Symp. Quantitative Biology 39:847-857,1974.

Wang L  Duesberg P  Kawai S et al.  Location of Envelope-specific
and Sarcoma-specific Oligonucleotides on RNA of Schmidt-Tuppin Rous
Sarcoma Virus  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.  73:447-451,1978.

Junghans R P  Boone L R  Skalka A M  Retroviral DNA H Structures:
Displcement-Assimilation Model of Recombination  Cell 30:53-62,1982.

Iorio A M  Barzi A  Merletti P R et. al.  A Viral Immunodepressive
Factor Associated With Expermental Mouse Tumors  Cancer Research
36:3851-3853,1976.  (This paper establishes beyond any reasonable
dount the relationship between the intentional production of viruses
capable of immunodepression and the “REQUEST” for the production of
the AIDS virus in Bull. WHO 47:257-263,1972.  See references and the
Bonnard, Manders, and Campbell paper above under PRODUCTION.)


The following paper, entitled “IS AIDS BIOLOGICAL WARFARE”
was sent to me by Dr. Strecker who has no access to computer
networks for the explicit purpose of universal publication
without charge or consideration for the purpose of education only.
Further information is available as noted below.  The remainder of this
file is by Dr. Strecker.



Thank you for requesting this information.    We have a story to tell
you, a very strange story, one that affects you, me, and every other human
being on earth.  A story that must be taken seriously by the governments of
every nation in the world because there may not be many humans left to
govern by the turn of the century, or shortly thereafter.  A story so
bizarre, and so sinister that, if it were not for the fact that it is all
true, it would make a great science fiction thriller. (Interestingly
enough, Lorimar Pictures of Hollywood has purchased the rights to Dr.
Strecker’s life story.)

The story begins in 1983 with Dr. Robert B. Strecker, M.D., Ph.D.  Dr.
Strecker practices internal medicine and gastroenterology in Los Angeles.
He is a trained pathologist and also holds a Ph.D. in pharmacology. Dr.
Strecker and his brother, Ted, an attorney, were preparing a proposal for a
health maintenance organization (HMO) for Security Pacific Bank of
California.  They needed to know the long-term financial effects of
insuring and treating AIDS patients.  In as much as this information was
not readily available in 1983, both brothers began researching the medical
literature to learn what they could about this relatively new disease.  The
information they uncovered right from the beginning was so startling to
them, so hard to believe, that it would dramatically alter both their lives
and lead them on a five year quest culminating with the creation of “The
Strecker Memorandum,” the most controversial video tape of our time, and a
remarkable set of documents called “The Bioattack Alert.”


Right there in the medical literature for anyone to read for themselves
was, basically, proof that the AIDS virus and pandemic was actually
PREDICTED years ago by a world famous virologist, among others.  They found
that top scientists writing in the Bulletin of the World Health
Organization were actually REQUESTING that AIDS like viruses be created to
study the effects on humans.  In fact, the Streckers unearthed thousands of
documents all supporting the manmade origin of AIDS. Meanwhile, the
government was telling everyone that a green monkey in Africa bit some
native and started AIDS.  As their research continued, it became obvious
from the documentation that the virus itself was not only created as
requested, but actually DEPLOYED, and now threatens the existence of
mankind because it does what it was designed to do:  cause cancer in humans
via a contagious virus. Eventually the Streckers came to realize everything
the government, the so-called AIDS experts and media were telling the
public was not only misleading, but out and out lies.  The truth of the
matter is:

AIDS is a manmade disease;
AIDS is not a homosexual disease;
AIDS is not a venereal disease;
AIDS can be carried by mosquitos;
Condoms will not prevent AIDS;
There are a least six different AIDS viruses
loose in the world;
There will never be a vaccine cure;
And on and on, but…


The most dreaded fear that all oncologists (cancer doctors), virologists,
and immunologists live with is that some day CANCER, in one form or
another, will become a contagious disease, transferable from one person to
another.  AIDS has now made fear a reality. If you think you are safe
because you are not gay or promiscuous, or because you are not sexually
active, then you must watch “The Strecker Memorandum” very carefully.


The most common misconception being foisted upon us right now concerns
sexually active Americans.  We are told that if a man uses a condom the
transference of the deadly virus is virtually eliminated.  Nothing could be
further from the truth. Of the body fluids that the AIDS virus is found in,
semen is the least. As a matter of fact, in every single study ever
published on the subject, no one has found a significant amount in anyone’s
semen.  It just isn’t there in huge numbers.  There is usually only about
one virus per milliliter, a statistically irrelevant amount.  One copious
ejaculation might produce only one or two viruses.  This is substantiated
in the medical literature.  But, just for argument’s sake, let’s say all
the medical studies are wrong.  Let’s pretend that there are countless
millions of AIDS viruses in the ejaculation.  Are you aware that condoms
are riddled with microscopic or larger holes?  Studies show that even the
smallest holes found in condoms are two to ten times larger than the AIDS
virus.  It’s like shooting a golf ball through a basketball hoop.  Condoms
have not, will not, and cannot prevent AIDS.


Fifty thousand Americans have already died because they didn’t know the
truth about AIDS.  Between twelve and fifteen million Americans have
already been infected. One in 60 babies born in New York City is infected;
one in 300 college students in America is infected; one in 20 aliens
applying for amnesty is infected, including men, women and children.  These
are just some of the facts you are not likely to hear about from the media.


One of the first things the Streckers did was to try and tell their medical
and legal colleagues what they were finding in the literature.  Some were
interested; most were not.  Certainly no one was prepared to risk their
professional standing by making waves within the establishment.  Ted
Strecker compiled some of the most damaging documents into a report he
called “The Bioalert Attack” and sent it to every Governor of every state,
the President, the VICE-PRESIDENT (now President), the FBI, the CIA, the
NSA, and selected members of Congress.  He got a grand total of three
replies from three governors; nothing from the government.  Both he and Dr.
Strecker were laughed at and ridiculed at every turn.  As an example, Dr.
Strecker told the government in 1985 that virtually every person testing
positive for AIDS would die prematurely and painfully.  The government said
that was nonsense.  Their figures showed that maybe ten percent at most
would die from the disease.  In 1986, the government said maybe 50 percent
of those infected would die, in 1987 they said maybe 75 percent, in 1988
they finally agreed with Dr. Strecker that AIDS is virtually 100 percent
fatal.  We could go on with facts Dr. Strecker unearthed that the “experts”
said were wrong and now accepted as the truth.  Dr. Strecker, like a good
scientist, submitted paper after paper with his findings to all the
prestigious medical journals in America.  They were refused.  He then tried
having his findings published in Europe.  Again, closed doors. What to do?
Dr. Strecker did not feel he could take the time from his practice and his
research to write a book.  On the other hand, everyone has a TV and now
most households have a video cassette recorder (VCR). The time involved to
make a video is nothing compared to writing a book, and so the video “The
Strecker Memorandum” was created.  It is 96 minutes of the most startling,
controversial, and information packed video you will ever see.  It disputes
virtually everything the American public is being told by the government,
the so-called AIDS experts and the media.  In fact, after seeing it YOU
will know more about AIDS than 99 percent of all doctors in America.


With the video made, it seemed a simple matter to advertise it and the
world would now become aware of what it was facing, right?  WRONG!  The
fact that you are even reading about “The Strecker Memorandum” now is a
minor miracle by itself, in as much as TV stations have refused to
advertise it.  TV and radio time brokers that sell blocks of commercial
time have refused to sell us time.  TV station managers have refused to
even air programs containing interviews with Dr. Strecker.  A national
radio network did an interview with a famous talk show host and Dr.
Strecker and then refused to run it.  Virtually every big name network
television magazine show and all the syndicated TV interviewers and talk
show hosts have said NO to Dr. Strecker. Big city newspapers will not take
any print ads telling about it, and so it goes…WHY?  What is in “The
Strecker Memorandum” that sends a cold chill down the spine of most media


The excuse that we hear over and over is that it is too controversial.
TOO CONTROVERSIAL?  They say that this information, if widely disseminated,
will cause the public to panic.  If someone had poisoned your water supply
and you and your family could die, wouldn’t you want to know about it?
Would you panic? Or would you more likely be outraged and try to find out
who did it and punish them?  We feel the only persons who might panic are
those scientists who willingly or otherwise created AIDS and are now
promoting misinformation by covering it up.  After all, if you made AIDS
would you tell anyone about it?


The number of AIDS infected people is doubling approximately every 12
months, and in some areas even sooner.  With twelve to fifteen million
Americans carrying the virus, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to
see how long we have here in the U.S. Africa has, conservatively, 75
million infected; some estimates double that.  Brazil as a country is in
serious jeopardy because all through the 1970’s they were buying their
blood supply from Africa.  On top of that, the World Health Organization
conducted a large scale small pox vaccination program there in the 1970’s
(for the full implications of that see “The Strecker Memorandum”).
Southern Japan has about 30 percent infected with HTLV I, the leukemia
causing virus (although you will never hear about that on TV). Russia is
now reporting AIDS as a problem and no one can enter Russia permanently
without a current negative blood test for AIDS.  Cuba has already set up
concentration camps for AIDS infected and they are full (you won’t see that
on TV either).  Haiti of course is ravaged by AIDS; more than 15 percent of
the people infected and getting worse every day.  And so it goes. Virtually
every nation on earth with few exceptions (Iran is one) is reporting a
growing problem.  It’s on every continent, every subcontinent, and every
island chain, Atlantic and Pacific.  So why won’t the media or government
tell you these things?  Is it too controversial for you to handle?  Are you
going to panic?


Yes and no.  NO, if you are waiting for the government to create a magic
bullet.  As you will see in “The Strecker Memorandum,” part of the problem
is that all the various AIDS viruses are “recombinant retroviruses.”  Very
simply, that means they have the ability to recombine with the genes of any
cell they enter and the offspring or new viruses they form are different
from the parent viruses.  HTLV III alone (that’s the most common American
AIDS virus) has the mathematical ability to change itself
9,000×9,000×9,000×9000 times (which is 9,000 to the fourth power).  The
common cold recombines much less frequently and we haven’t found a cure for
it after a hundred years. Besides, does it make much sense to entrust the
cure for AIDS to the same people that may have created it?  YES, there is
hope if Dr. Strecker and a growing number of realistic scientists are
correct in looking at alternative, nonallopathic, non drug modalities based
on Raman spectroscopy.  In fact many experiments are going on now that
offer great promise.  Unfortunately, our government takes a dim view of any
type of treatment for any type of disease let alone AIDS that does not
conform to its rigid rules for acceptance, registration, and legalization.
Of course the FDA would definitely like to see an allopathic drug treatment
or cure presented by an ethical drug company or university.  Well, we don’t
think that’s going to happen.  Because of this attitude, much
experimentation in America must go underground, underfunded, or out of the
country entirely.  Again, this is explained further in “The Strecker


An ominous personal aspect of this story has been the sudden and unexpected
deaths of two of the key players. First, Dr.Strecker’s brother, Ted
Strecker, was found shot to death in his home in Springfield, Missouri, an
apparent suicide, on August 11,1988.  Was Ted Strecker suicidal?  Perhaps.
In the past he suffered from depression and monumental frustration at the
relative lack of interest in his findings.  Dr. Strecker spoke with him the
night before his death.  Ted was cheerful, in good spirits, and looking
forward to certain new developments that promised progress.  The next day
he was found dead, his 22 caliber rifle next to him.  No note, no message,
no goodbyes to anyone.  Very untypical of him.  Officially a suicide.
Next. Illinois State Representative Douglas Huff of Chicago was found alone
in his home, dead from an apparent overdose of cocaine and heroin, on
September 22, 1988. Representative Huff did everything in his power to make
the Illinois State Legislature and the people of Chicago aware of Dr.
Strecker’s work.  He was very vocal, gave many press interviews, was
constantly on television and radio urging people to wake up to the cover-up
concerning AIDS.  Did Representative Huff use drugs?  Perhaps yes, but only
occasionally and recreationally.  Was he an addict?  No.  Would he have
known how dangerous a massive overdose off cocaine and heroin was?  Yes, of
course.  Cause of death: officially a stroke.  Dr. Strecker has serious
doubts that his brother killed himself.  Representative Huff’s associates
doubt he died accidentally, and yet they are gone.  Who’s next?


We all know it is easier for a king to have a lie believed than a beggar to
spread the truth.  Well, we are spreading the truth about AIDS.
Unfortunately, it isn’t pretty.  But the fact is you are not being told the
truth by the government or the so-called AIDS experts.  The media, for
reasons of their own, will not present information contradicting the
official propaganda. So you can choose to go along with the same people who
gave us brain cancer (SV40 virus) as a result of their contaminated polio
vaccines in the early 1960’s; a polio like disease from their contaminated
Swine Flu vaccine in the 1970’s; and AIDS from their smallpox and hepatitis
B vaccines; or, you can at least make yourself aware of the clear and
present dangers that we all face by watching “The Strecker Memorandum.”
The cost of the tape is nominal, but we submit that remaining ignorant can
cost infinitely more.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this essay please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Leave a Comment