Qualifier: Women should be able to abort pregnancies. (This is really a restated claim. A qualifier concedes that all or part of your claim can be rebutted, but it asserts that it is still reasonable in most cases. ) Original enthronement: Abortion should be legalized because women or partners could have had an accident that led to the pregnancy. Claim: Abortion should be legalized in California. Stated Reason: Because many women could have had an accident that impacts greatly on the woman’s life.
Grounds: Examples that some women are possibly incapable in bearing a child or who do not want to have children. Warrant: If unplanned pregnancies occur often, they should allow women to have a free will of aborting the child. Backing: Some women are incapable of caring for a child is because they mentally/ physically incapable of taking care of a child, they have been raped and they do not want to bear the child of the rapist who scared their life, or that they do not want children.
Counterclaim 1: Perhaps killing a forming baby is basically killing a person. Counterclaim 2: There are adoption agencies who do take in children and they could offer the child to loving parents who are capable of taking care of the child. Therefore, there would not be a need to have a problem with the child in the future. (Supply Rebuttal Arguments:) Rebut the counterclaims and reinforce your original claim, adding a qualifier if needed.
Rebut Counterclaim 1: It is not technically killing he baby because the baby is consider a zygote, which is a cell and within the cell there are parts of organs forming, yet it’s not fully developed and is still consider as a cell not a baby. Rebut Counterclaim 2: Many adoption agencies do take in children, but they are Just as many children who do not get adopted and there are some foster parents who mistreat foster children. By putting up the child for adoption is like entering a child in a lottery. Abortion: Pregnancy and Supply Rebuttal Arguments By electrodynamics