Home » Morality » Killings Andre Dubus

Killings Andre Dubus

“Killings” by the Late Andre Dubus is a short story about a man named Richard Strout who murders his wife’s lover in cold blood. Although he feels justified in his actions, the law does not see it that way and he is ultimately arrested and tried for his crime. Through this story, Dubus explores the complex morality of murder and its effect on those who commit it.

Although Richard Strout believes that he has done nothing wrong, the law does not see it that way. He is arrested and put on trial for his crime. This experience is a wake-up call for him, and he realizes that murder is not something to be taken lightly. The impact of his actions on his family and friends is also evident, and he is forced to confront the reality of his actions.

“Killings” by the Late Andre Dubus is a thought-provoking story that explores the complex morality of murder. It is an insightful look at the impact that such a crime can have on those who commit it.

Andre Dubus’s story, “Killings”, reveals the dark depths of crime, revenge, and morality. The central character’s motivations for his actions are sympathetic–all he wants is to avenge his son’s murder. But the methods he takes are decidedly unethical, plunging him into a maelstrom of self-destruction and doubt about whether what he did was right or wrong.

After exacting his own justice, the vigilante was left in an impossible situation. He failed to anticipate the guilt that came with his crime. Throughout the narrative, the protagonist’s emotions of rage and righteousness are evident.

Nevertheless, he must deal with the consequences of taking another person’s life. The story addresses a universal question: Is it ever justified to kill another human being?

The story begins with the protagonist, Richard Strout, finding out that his son has been murdered. In a state of shock and disbelief, he seeks revenge on the man who killed his son. He tracks down the murderer and kills him in cold blood. However, after committing the murder, he begins to feel guilty and regrets his decision.

The main focus of “Killings” is a crime and its repercussions. The lead character, Matt Fowler, takes things one step too far when he identifies with the murderer of his son-Willis Trottier. Together they execute Richard Strout, who killed Fowler’s son. While this murder was more about private revenge than public protection, it was partially motivated by Fowler’s desire to protect his wife from encountering their son’s killer ( & , 2000 ).

The story is not simply a study of morality; it is also an exploration of feeling. What interests Dubus is the human capacity for change, for growth-and for love. In spite of the horrific events in his life, Matt Fowler manages to find some measure of peace and happiness at the end of the story.

While “Killings” may initially appear to be a simple tale of crime and punishment, Andre Dubus expertly weaves together a number of complex themes, making it a thought-provoking and emotionally powerful story.

The reader is left to ponder the nature of justice, morality, and revenge. Does Matt Fowler ultimately receive justice? Is his act morally defensible? And was Willis Trottier right to take the law into his own hands? These are just some of the questions that “Killings” raises, making it a truly thought-provoking work of fiction.

According to Dubus, “Ruth can’t even go out for cigarettes and aspirin….She sees him all the time. It makes her cry” ( ).). While it is too late to protect his son at this point, Fowler experiences his son’s murder as an attack on both his role as a father and also on his desire to protect children in general. Matt could no longer stand watching helplessly as Ruth fell apart before his eyes- all because she couldn’t deal with the loss of their shared child. So, he decided to bring some closure by killing Strout himself and put an end to both of their Suffering once and for good.

While it may be understandable why Fowler killed Strout, it was still morally wrong. In our society, we generally do not take the law into our own hands. We have established a criminal justice system to deal with murderers and other criminals. This system is not perfect, but it is the best we have. When we take the law into our own hands, as Fowler did, we are saying that the system has failed us.

It is also important to remember that Matt killed an innocent man. While Strout may have caused Ruth great pain, he did not deserve to die. In addition, Matt’s actions will likely cause more pain for Ruth in the long run. She will have to live with the knowledge that her husband killed a man, even if that man did hurt her deeply.

Overall, “Killings” is a thought-provoking story that forces the reader to consider the nature of justice and morality. While it is understandable why Fowler killed Strout, his actions were still wrong. The story also highlights the importance of communication and understanding within relationships.

Peter Strout is devastated by his crime. Strout, the character who is shot in the story, is clearly guilty yet he is also a human being, which was forgotten by Fowler so that he might be killed. At the conclusion of the narrative, fowler considers Strout’s girlfriend as she sleeps unaware of her partner’s death. Even those who sympathized with his violence were alienated from Fowler after he carried out the act.

When he is with his girlfriend, all Fowler can think about is the girl that Strout was with and how she will never be able to see her boyfriend again. This event has a profound effect on Fowler as he realizes that he can never take back what he did. There are many factors that lead to Fowler’s actions but in the end, it was his own sense of morality that led him to do the right thing.

Inferior morality? Richard Strout must be one heck of a man. He’s the protagonist in quite an intense story – he murders another man out of passion after catching him with his estranged wife. Oof, that would Philo Bevilaqua land anyone in hot water. Society obviously doesn’t look too kindly on spouse-murdering these days, but back then it was probably just filed away under “passion.”

From what I understand about olden times through reading this wonderful piece of historical fiction, people were pretty upset when their wives ran off and married other guys right after getting separated. Anger leads to conflict though – rightfully so! In any case, kudos to the author for making such an exciting read.

In his mind, he is justified in the killing because he was provoked. His attorney even tries to use this as a defense in court, but it is ultimately unsuccessful.

The story does not paint Strout as a sympathetic character, but rather as a man who made a terrible mistake and is now facing the consequences. He is portrayed as being regretful for what he has done, but also aware that there is no going back and undoing it. The focus of the story is on how Strout deals with the aftermath of his crime and how his actions have affected those around him.

While “Killings” is certainly a tragedy, it does not dwell on the violence of the act itself. Instead, it focuses on the emotional fallout and how Strout’s crime has changed his life forever.

Cite This Work

To export a reference to this essay please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.