In what ways are an individual’s choices and actions influenced by society and government? A person’s choices and actions are a reflection of some of the greatest influences in our society and are a direct mirror of the political agendas of our government. There are many aspects in our daily life that can impact how we decide to live. There is music influence, community influence, influence from one’s peers, and influence from the political leaders that have invested a lot of time in controlling the masses minds and actions.
For example, if people really looked at the music that is being played on the radio and the content and lyrics that are embedded in the song, one could see why so many people in this generation find the most self destructive behavior to be cool. At the Superbowl 2016, so much controversy took place when Beyonce sang her song Formation, as a way to express her many feelings about the massive injustices that have been occurring in minority communities and in the world as a whole. Her song caused so much divisiveness from political parties and law enforcement, that the police don’t even want to protect her now at her concerts.
This past weekend she had a concert in her hometown of Houston, TX, and the law enforcement protested her versus protecting her because she supports the Black Lives Matter cause. She did however have protection from the community as a whole. Her story is a prime example on how society actions made her decide to protest through her musical resource against the people that sit in very influential seats of government power in an effort to find unity, inspire hope, and encourage equality. Society along with government has a huge impact on the citizens and all of the hidden agendas seem to overtake all citizens and create more unrest.
Money, power, social status, and worldly possessions are what makes a person in a society feel empowered. However, the government’s prime focus is always about keeping all citizens under their control. The constant leading actions of those that make decisions for us all, seems to move the majority of the citizens in situations that can make them lose their way in life. Jane Austen, author of the book Pride and Prejudice, showed the act of money, love and power taking over a society, and how these actions are shown through the use of Jane and Mr. Darcy.
Jane Austen compiled a historical diary of life and the times in the middle classes, around the period that stretched on until 1830. In the book, the characters that were described back in Jane’s time, seemed to only marry for money, status, and power. Through her descriptions, it showed how truly rare it was that people actually married each other for love. Jane wrote of an everyday lifestyle that she was experiencing at some point in life. She spoke of her desire for romance, the reality of embracing fantasy and the ultimate conflict with what true love was or if it really existed.
As a woman, the things that she observed throughout her life in regards to love may have been the reason she never married. Jane only spoke once of a romantic encounter in her life and no more throughout the book. However, she did speak of specific romances that influenced and changed some of the characters throughout the novel. Pride and Prejudice is a love story and a life story all in one. It was so much inner conflict and reflection points from the first page in the book until the end.
It is an enjoyable journey through a world of love, hate and being mature and wise when in love or wanting power. The atmosphere is cold there are little descriptions of the setting. The main actions of the novel are between opinions, ideas, and attitudes, which advances the plot of the novel. The emotions in the novel are to be beneath the surface of the story and are not expressed to the readers directly. The main subject in the novel is stated in the first sentence “It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune, must be in want of a wife.
In this statement, Jane Austen has declared that the main subject of the novel will be courtship and marriage, Jay Gatsby, Daisy, Tom, Myrtle in the novel The Great Gatsby are also characters who highlights the actions of Money, love, insanity, and pain. Many great novels like The Great Gatsby overdo the subject of “passing,” which involves a character pretending to be something or someone that he or she is not. Even though it takes awhile for us to learn that Gatsby has invented this new life in order to be someone from a higher social class, just to show Daisy (The love of his life ) that he did this all for her.
Considering what the reader learns about Gatsby’s and the life that he has created for himself, there is conflict about this man who is so mysterious, but as his fake identity is exposed, he becomes pathetic and helpless. Jay cannot live without Daisy, but Tom is refusing to let Daisy live without him. The Cherry Orchard blends elements of the tragic and the comic. Although the subject of the play the Ranevsky loss of their home is a tragic one, Chekhov subtitled the play as a Comedy, presenting his characters, their speech and actions most ineffectual.
However, this work shows one of Chekhov’s themes “the triumph of ignorance and vulgarity over the fragile traditions of elegance and nobility”. His characters bring to the stage a realism of traditional drama. The Cherry Orchard had government conflict when it came to Ranevsky losing the ancestral house The genre of Arthur Miller’s “The Crucible” is, in a certain sense, a strict form that clearly delineates the role of the writer relative to the text. Miller challenges dramatic conventions somewhat by writing what might actually be considered a preface prior to the commencement of action in Act One.
In this section, Arthur Miller situates “The Crucible” within its historical context, and he does not refrain from offering his own opinions about the Salem witch trials and their lasting social implications. This curious form of an introduction might, in fact, be the most important part of the play, for it explains the symbolic motivations that created the conditions that made the witch hunt possible, and, as Miller argues, such a witch hunt is not necessarily a relic of history. Write an essay in which you offer a thoughtful analysis of this introduction.
Consider what meaning and insight it offers with respect to the larger narrative of this play, and consider how Miller’s motivations influence the reader’s interpretation of the play and its meaning. plays are generally classified into one of two categories: tragedies or comedies. Each of these two categories possesses a particular set of conventions and characteristics that can be used to identify plays as either a tragedy or a comedy. On the surface, The Crucible appears to be a tragedy. Decide whether you agree with this classification of the play. If you do, identify the elements of the play that render it tragic.
If you do not agree that The Crucible is a tragedy, or if you feel that it is a hybrid, then defend your position with evidence drawn directly from the text. For help with this, be sure to look at the , Death of a Salesman, for similar themes In this novel, you will observe that everybody in the whole society is watched and has no privacy in whatsoever conditions. Every individual is constantly under surveillance. This makes people frustrated who want to live a free and individual life but it seems to be an impossible task to accomplish to lead to individualism.
Here you can focus that in what ways this constant watch affects the life of every individual as well as the whole society. In the novel 1984, there is a description of a society which is controlled in almost every sense; even the most innate impulses like sex and love too. It is all caused by a system created through a variety of types of media in society which broadcasts distrust and suspicions strongly among people that even the blood relatives don’t believe in one another. This shows how natural impulses are controlled and oppressed in the society.
Your thesis statement could revolve around this oppression and its effects and consequences. The problem however, as Ray Bradbury demonstrates in his novel Fahrenheit 451, is that those things which make us happy initially may eventually lead to our downfall. By examining Guy Montag, the protagonist in Fahrenheit 451, and the world he lives in we can gain valuable insights to direct us in our own pursuit of happiness. From Montag and other characters we will learn how physical, emotional, and spiritual happiness can drastically affect our lives.
In Fahrenheit 451, the citizens of the city in which Montag lives are disconnected from the physical world. They are constantly watching their “wall TVs” with “seashells” in their ears. They have no conversations with each other that are meaningful, and they drive so fast they can never see the beauty of nature that is around them. America in Fahrenheit 451 has separated itself from nature. The people have convinced themselves that those who take time to do things like have conversations and appreciate nature are “strange”, and so they ostracize them.
In the novel, Clarisse is a perfect example of one of these “strange” people. Clarisse and her family enjoy nature. They like to sit with each other and have conversations. Sometimes, they even go on walks. Montag observes Clarisse “shaking a walnut tree,” and on the “lawn knitting a blue sweater. ” She even brings him bouquets of flowers, sacks of chestnuts, and pins fallen leaves to his door (Bradbury 28). Montag asks Clarisse why she is never in school. She replies, “Oh, they don’t miss me. I’m anti-social, they say. | don’t mix. It’s so strange. I’m very social indeed. It all depends on what you mean by social, doesn’t it? Social to me is talking to you about… how strange the world is” (Bradbury 29). The way Clarisse is treated demonstrates exactly how disconnected society is from the natural world. They have no regard for the physical world so they exclude those who do. Mildred loves her TV programs, rather, she is obsessed with them. Montag tells us that “no matter when he came in, the walls were always talking to Mildred” (Bradbury 44).
While explaining to Montag the history behind how society came to burning books, Captain Beatty says, “People want to be happy, isn’t that right? Haven’t you heard it all your life? I want to be happy, people say. Well, aren’t they? Don’t we keep them moving, don’t we give them fun? That’s all we live for, isn’t it? For pleasure, for titillation? ” (Bradbury 59) One could argue that our modern society only lives for pleasure. The most important thing that Fahrenheit 451 teaches us is that pleasure is not happiness.
